51.23 / 06.78 ILLUSTRATIVE VIEW
Role evidenceQuestion to examine
Fictional case / Company connections
THREE COUNTRIES. ONE SHARED DIRECTOR.
What is actually connected? Inspect the role relationships, open the source and challenge the ownership assertion.
Illustrative website case
Download source pack (ZIP)
Fictional training case: Network JSON, separate input checkpoints, source excerpts and English instructions. Free download; no signup. Names and source text keep their original language.
INTERACTIVE ILLUSTRATION · SYNTHETIC DATA
The case
LB Training — Lindenwerk GmbH and LB Training — Merebridge Ltd name Mara Voss, explicitly matched by exercise identifier LB-P-001, as a director. Atelier Rive names Émile Lenoir; Merebridge also names Owen Reed. A separate analyst note infers that Lindenwerk may own Merebridge.
Your task is to separate what the supplied records state from what the analyst inferred.
Three routes into the same question
The German specimen is a short key/value record for manual entry. The French specimen is a semicolon-delimited company list for CSV mapping. The English officer notice is prose for AI proposal review.
Each route has its own starter checkpoint. Use the checkpoints to avoid adding the same company repeatedly when you compare input methods.
Follow the evidence
1 / Inspect the companies
Compare names, legal forms, jurisdictions and the registration references as supplied.
2 / Select the shared officer
Read Mara’s director relationships to Lindenwerk and Merebridge, then find the source excerpt for each.
3 / Challenge the ownership claim
Check whether either notice establishes ownership, then inspect the correction.
4 / Write a narrower explanation
State what the roles establish, what they do not establish and what remains unknown.
A source to inspect
“LB Training — Mara Voss (training person LB-P-001) is a director of LB Training — Merebridge Ltd.”
Authored fictional training text. It is not an official filing or a live registry response.
A connection, with limits
Mara’s roles connect Lindenwerk and Merebridge. They do not establish that Lindenwerk owns Merebridge. The ownership inference is disputed, but the correction does not prove the absence of ownership; ownership remains undetermined.
Work through the inputs
Read the complete input walkthrough, then use the prototype with synthetic or non-sensitive material. Working Networks are unencrypted and local to the browser profile.
Independent-copy preview
The planned snapshot workflow will let a reader inspect a frozen Network, sign in and create a separate local copy. Sharing is not yet available. The illustrated website case does not publish or save a Network.