# Same handle. Same person?

LAGE BUREAU — X cut 3 of 3. A finished, intentionally silent 28-second film. The headline, captions and prototype/synthetic labels are burned in. Equivalent English WebVTT and SRT captions accompany this descriptive transcript.

## Descriptive transcript

**00:00–00:02.20 — Same handle. Same person?**
The supplied NORTH-EAST SIGNAL logo sits on a black title card. “OSINT / IDENTITY AMBIGUITY” introduces the question. The film identifies its material as actual app footage of a fictional example.

**00:02.20–00:05.20 — Follow the lead.**
A rectangular crop of the actual Network canvas shows distinct people and online accounts, with the existing “Matching handle only” connection. The editorial caption reads: “Two profiles. One repeated handle.” This establishes a clue; it does not identify a shared account operator.

**00:05.20–00:08.20 — Check the attribution.**
The real relationship inspector shows “Analyst confidence — Disputed,” “Created by — Manual entry,” and “Sources and citations — 2 citations.” It concerns the existing fictional Rina Vale-to-Training Forum attribution. The operator of that forum account is not established.

**00:08.20–00:14.20 — Read the correction.**
The real disputing-citation excerpt is enlarged: “The exercise maintainer records Rina Vale’s clarification: the @fieldglass Training Forum account is not operated by LB Training — Rina Vale.” The editorial caption reads: “Rina does not operate this account.” This is a correction inside the authored fictional exercise, not a real-person allegation or a live profile result.

**00:14.20–00:19.20 — Keep the original context.**
A close crop of the real contextual citation reads: “A handle matching the Training Stream profile is insufficient to establish a shared operator.” The editorial caption reads: “A matching handle is insufficient.” The record retains both the originating context and the disputing citation.

**00:19.20–00:25.20 — Keep uncertainty visible.**
The real analyst note reads: “Retained as a contested analyst assertion. Read both its originating context and the correction; this is not an established fact.” The editorial caption reads: “Retain the contested assertion.” The attribution stays visibly disputed; it is not promoted to a confirmed relationship or silently replaced with a claim about someone else.

**00:25.20–00:28.00 — Follow the evidence.**
An editorial end card reads “Explore Lage Bureau,” “lagebureau.de,” and “A brand of Wehron GmbH.” Its website CTA is intended for the coordinated website release. Nothing is posted or published by producing this file.

## Recording and editorial provenance

This film uses the actual browser application's `04-disputed-identity-evidence.webm` recording from the synthetic identity-ambiguity fixture. All names, people, accounts, connections, sources and identifiers are invented training material. Authentication used an intercepted deterministic local mock, not a real account or provider session. No real AI response, snapshot publication, shared viewer or recipient copy was recorded or depicted.

The recording inspects an existing disputed record and its existing citations. It does not capture creation of a dispute, addition of the correction, or a change in confidence. Entities, relationships, sources and citations in the exported Network remained equal to the input fixture; selections and layout do not establish a change in meaning.

Application pixels are only trimmed, retimed for pacing and reading, rectangularly cropped and proportionally resized. There are no invented controls, redrawn app results or simulated source windows. Captions and framing are editorial and remain outside the captured pixels. The map is an orientation shot; selected inspector excerpts provide the readable evidence. Shot timings and crop coordinates are recorded in `storyboard.json` and `edit-manifest.json`. Display time is editorial, not a promised investigation duration.

The current prototype stores editable Networks locally in unencrypted browser storage. The demo is suitable for synthetic or non-sensitive test data; this recording does not demonstrate cloud persistence or collaboration.