Use case / Company research
DIFFERENT COUNTRIES. CONNECTIONS YOU CAN CHECK.
A short company entry, a spreadsheet and an officer notice can describe the same research question in different ways. Bring their information together while keeping the sources visible.
Independent company researchers and OSINT investigators
Fictional training case. Use synthetic or non-sensitive material in the prototype.
Which companies share a director?
Start with the relationship you want to examine. A person named as a director of two companies gives you two role assertions to check. Ownership or control requires its own support.
Choose the input that fits the material
Enter a short record manually. Map a company table into entity fields through CSV preview. Use integrated AI assistance on pasted prose, then inspect the suggested relationships and excerpts before applying them.
Company fields include legal form, jurisdiction, registration number and address. The fictional German, French and UK specimens show analyst mapping choices; they are not live registry integrations.
Keep the source beside the assertion
Attach citations to the entity or relationship they concern. Give each assertion an analyst confidence, and use a disputing citation when new material challenges it. Keep a source's wording distinct from an analyst's interpretation.
Leave with an explanation
The case ends with a concise analyst-written briefing: Mara Voss is a director of Lindenwerk and Merebridge; Émile Lenoir is a director of Atelier Rive; Owen Reed is also a director of Merebridge. The shared role does not establish that Lindenwerk owns Merebridge. The Network supplies inspectable records; the app does not generate a finished report in this workflow.
Three countries. One shared director.
Work through the fictional Lindenwerk, Atelier Rive and Merebridge records. Read the disputed assertion before deciding what the shared director means.